Surface Finish Conversion Chart — Ra, Rz, RMS, N Grade Reference for Deep Hole Drilling

Complete surface finish conversion chart for Ra, Rz, RMS, Rt, Rmax, and N grades per ISO 1302 and ASME B46.1. Achievable finishes by manufacturing process, deep hole drilling methods comparison, sealing surface requirements, and measurement cut-off length guidance.

Deep Hole DrillingReference7 min read

Complete Conversion Table (ISO 1302 / ASME B46.1)

N Grade Ra (µm) Ra (µin) RMS (µin) Rz (µm) Rt / Rmax (µm) CLA (µin)
N1 0.025 1 1.1 0.1 0.3 1
N2 0.05 2 2.2 0.2 0.5 2
N3 0.10 4 4.4 0.4 0.8 4
N4 0.20 8 8.8 0.8 1.2 8
N5 0.40 16 17.6 1.6 2.0 16
N6 0.80 32 35.2 3.2 4.0 32
N7 1.6 63 69.3 6.3 8.0 63
N8 3.2 125 137.5 12.5 16.0 125
N9 6.3 250 275 25 31.3 250
N10 12.5 500 550 50 62.5 500
N11 25 1,000 1,100 100 125 1,000

Conversion Factors

Convert From To Factor Notes
RMS Ra Ra ≈ RMS × 0.90 RMS = Root Mean Square; older US standard; more sensitive to single scratches than Ra
Ra RMS RMS ≈ Ra × 1.11
Rz Ra Ra ≈ Rz × 0.14 Rz to Ra ratio varies by process: grinding ~5:1, turning ~7:1, milling ~10:1
Ra Rz Rz ≈ Ra × 7.2 Use as a guideline only — actual ratio depends on surface profile
Rt (Rmax) Ra Ra ≈ Rt × 0.115 Rt is the maximum peak-to-valley height over the evaluation length
Ra Rt Rt ≈ Ra × 8.7
CLA (µin) Ra (µm) Ra = CLA ÷ 40 CLA = Center-Line Average (British term, equivalent to Ra)

Important: The conversion between Ra and Rz is only approximate. The actual ratio depends on the surface profile shape. A ground surface typically has a lower Rz/Ra ratio (4–6:1) than a turned surface (7–10:1) because grinding produces a more uniform profile. For precision deep hole drilling, specifying both Ra and Rz provides better process control than Ra alone.

Measurement Cut-Off Length (ISO 4288)

The cut-off length (λc) determines the filter used to separate roughness from waviness. Use the correct cut-off for the expected Ra value:

Ra Range (µm) Recommended Cut-Off (mm) Evaluation Length (mm)
< 0.02 0.08 0.4
0.02–0.1 0.25 1.25
0.1–2.0 0.8 4.0
2.0–10.0 2.5 12.5
> 10.0 8.0 40.0

For deep hole drilling (typical Ra 0.4–3.2 µm), a cut-off of 0.8 mm with 4.0 mm evaluation length is standard.

Achievable Finishes by Manufacturing Process

Process Ra (µm) N Grade Typical Application
Super polishing 0.025–0.05 N1–N2 Laser mirrors, gauge blocks
Lapping 0.05–0.10 N2–N3 Precision gauge blocks
Scraper handwork 0.1–0.2 N3–N4 Precision machine slides
Grinding (production) 0.2–0.8 N4–N6 Bearing journals, shafts
SRB (skive + roller burnish) 0.05–0.2 N3–N4 Hydraulic cylinder bores (mirror finish)
Honing 0.1–0.4 N3–N5 Engine cylinders, hydraulic tubes
Gun drilling (as-drilled) 0.4–1.6 N5–N7 Precision small-diameter deep holes
BTA drilling 0.8–3.2 N6–N8 Larger deep holes (20–200 mm dia.)
Reaming 0.8–1.6 N6–N7 Semi-finish bore refinement
Fine turning / boring 0.8–1.6 N6–N7 General precision machining
Ejector drilling 1.6–3.2 N7–N8 Retrofit deep hole drilling
CNC milling (standard) 1.6–3.2 N7–N8 General machining
Trepanning 3.2–6.3 N8–N9 Large annular bores (as-drilled)
Conventional twist drilling 3.2–6.3 N8–N9 Standard drilling

Deep Hole Drilling Methods — Surface Finish Detail

Method Typical Ra (µm) Typical Rz (µm) Best Ra Achievable Notes
Gun drilling 0.4–1.6 3–12 0.2 µm Guide pad burnishing improves finish
BTA drilling 0.8–3.2 6–24 0.4 µm Guide pad burnishing effect reduces Ra by 30–50%
Ejector drilling 1.0–3.0 7–22 0.6 µm Less effective chip evacuation than BTA
Trepanning 3.0–6.0 20–45 1.6 µm Typically requires secondary finishing
SRB (skive + burnish) 0.05–0.2 0.4–1.5 0.025 µm Post-drilling finishing process for cylinders

The guide pad burnishing effect in BTA drilling significantly improves surface finish beyond what the cutting edges alone produce. The guide pads compress and smooth the bore wall after the cutting edges pass. Research on BTA drilling of steel shows that the burnishing action can reduce surface roughness by 30–50% compared to the cutting action alone, while also inducing compressive residual stress that improves fatigue life.

Material-Specific Achievable Finish (Gun Drilling)

Material Typical Ra (µm) Optimal Ra (µm) Notes
Carbon steel (1045) 0.4–1.2 0.2 Good machinability, consistent finish
Alloy steel (4140, prehardened) 0.4–1.6 0.2 Slightly higher Ra range than 1045
Stainless steel 304/316 0.4–1.0 0.2 Can achieve excellent finish with sharp tooling
Tool steel (H13, hardened) 0.8–2.0 0.4 Higher hardness reduces achievable finish
Cast iron (gray) 0.4–1.2 0.2 Graphite acts as natural lubricant
Aluminum 0.4–1.6 0.2 Requires polished tool to prevent BUE
Brass (C360) 0.2–0.8 0.1 Best finish of all common materials
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V 0.8–2.0 0.4 Lower thermal conductivity affects finish
Inconel 718 0.8–2.5 0.6 Work-hardening makes consistent finish difficult

Ra Selection Guide

Ra (µm) Typical Use Relative Cost vs Baseline Production Method
0.025–0.05 Laser mirrors, gauge blocks Lapping, superfinishing
0.05–0.2 Mirror finish, hydraulic seals, SRB SRB, honing, lapping
0.2–0.4 Precision honing, ground bearing surfaces 2.5× Honing, grinding, SRB
0.4–0.8 Finish machining, gun drilling, precision bores 1.5× Gun drilling, fine boring, reaming
0.8–1.6 Standard quality machined finish 1.0× (baseline) BTA drilling, gun drilling, turning
1.6–3.2 Economy machined finish 0.7× BTA drilling, ejector drilling, milling
3.2–6.3 As-drilled, rough machining 0.5× Trepanning, conventional drilling

Sealing Surface Requirements

Seal Type Required Ra (µm) Typical Process
O-ring static (piston seal) ≤ 0.8 Gun drilling, fine boring, reaming
O-ring dynamic (rod seal) ≤ 0.4 SRB, honing
Lip seal surface (rotary) ≤ 0.2 SRB
Hydraulic spool valve bore ≤ 0.1 Lapping, SRB
Piston rod mirror finish ≤ 0.05 SRB, superfinishing
Mechanical face seal ≤ 0.05 Lapping, lapping
Gasket face ≤ 1.6 BTA drilling, milling

Surface Finish Symbols (ISO 1302)

Symbol Meaning
Ra 1.6 Roughness average 1.6 µm; material removal required
Ra 1.6 (with circle) Roughness average 1.6 µm; material removal prohibited (as-cast/as-rolled)
Ra max 0.8 Maximum permitted Ra value is 0.8 µm
Ra 0.8 / Rz 6.3 Both Ra and Rz specified; Rz for sealing surface control

For related reading, see the Deep Hole Drilling Surface Finish Guide, the Hardness Conversion Table, and the ISO Tolerance IT Grade Reference.

Deep Hole Drilling Editorial Team

We provide independent, practical content for deep hole drilling and precision manufacturing professionals. Our articles are researched and reviewed to ensure technical accuracy and relevance.

Have feedback? Contact us

Stay informed

Get the latest deep hole drilling insights delivered to your inbox.